Entity Framework Core .Include(...) is not the right solution to load 1:n relationships When I read about what people suggest to load 1:n relations, it makes me wonder if they know what they are doing. In Entity Framework Core, basically every LINQ expression translates into
Entity Framework Core Workaround for missing n:m mapping feature in Entity Framework Core A lot of guys are complaining on GitHub that implicit mapping for many-to-many relationships is missing for Entity Framework Core. I don't see this missing feature as too critical. With some clever patterns